Comments
Rad pictures man. On the edge of art/stock. I totally dig the last one. -Jonathan
#1 Jonathan Puckrin (Homepage) on 2006-01-04 01:02
On second look, I take that back.... ART no question the intensity of ripping up the whatever it is and jumping, it's a great story with a bad ending. -Jonathan "art isn't safe" -Rob Zombie
#2 Jonathan Puckrin (Homepage) on 2006-01-04 01:04
I appreciate how you posted your feedback unlike some of these other weenies. Anyone else who has commented as commented over e-mail. Comments like "cool photos . . . but I know you just wanted to try your new lens" or "your arm looks like a tree trunk" or "the third photo from the left in row three makes your butt look fat". Thanks, people. I really like the last photo, too . . . but you're going to poo-poo on my technique when you see the aperture at which it was shot . . . it was so cold and my feet were bare I just wanted to get off the roof and didn't want to move my lights around or tripod up to balance the ambient light and strobe light. I found a use for that defective print of one of Leanna's photos when I first tested the 5' octabox and a 50degree soft egg crate. Do you have any good rooftops to shoot on? I used to have access to Manulife Place but it looks like my last client that was in there just moved offices. Anywhere in Edmonton with a water tower?
#2.1 K (Homepage) on 2006-01-04 20:43
Your recollection of what Todrick told you (beginning "behind every great photographer . . .") has been on my mind a lot recently. An interesting observation . . . I'll be sure to contribute something to a discussion on this later. Give me a couple of years. :-)
#2.2 K (Homepage) on 2006-01-05 00:46
Add Comment

Enclosing asterisks marks text as bold (*word*), underscore are made via _word_.
Standard emoticons like :-) and ;-) are converted to images.
BBCode format allowed